论文部分内容阅读
记得几年前,一位知名度很高的老画家在与我们几位艺术界的后辈讨论各文学艺术门类之间的关系时,曾把摄影比喻为绘画的“邻居”。这种比喻大概主要是从艺术形式语言上去看的,比如两者都是用色彩和点线面在平面媒体上塑造形象,表现的内容也差不多,如人物、风景、静物……邻居之间虽然没什么亲情关系(这位老画家同时把文学喻为绘画的亲戚),但却是可以经常串门,相互走动,以至关系密切程度并不比亲戚差。不是么?当今的画家有多少不用摄影的手段去搜集素材,去记录对生活的观察;有的画家在进行创作时,更把照片作为十分重要的参考资
I remember a few years ago, when a well-known old painter discussed the relationship between literary and art genres with the younger generations of our art world, he compared photography to the painting “neighbors.” This analogy probably mainly from the language of the art form to see, such as both the use of color and point line surface in the graphic media to create the image, the performance of the content is similar, such as characters, landscapes, still life ... Although the neighbors There is no relation of affection (the old painter at the same time drawing literature as the relative of painting), but it is often able to get around and walk around each other so closely that they are no worse than their relatives. Is not it? How many painters do not use photography today to collect material, to record the observation of life; some painters in the creation, more photos as a very important reference