论文部分内容阅读
案由:华商某公司(以下简称甲方)市建某公司(以下简称乙方)2001年6月16日,甲方与乙方签订《工程承包合同》一份,双方约定:乙方以包工包料方式承包由甲方发包的“华商办公楼”工程。同时,双方在合同中又另行约定:对工程造价套用93定额按实结算;双方因履行合同发生争议由某市仲裁委员会依法进行处理。 工程竣工以后,双方在工程结算中因结算价格发生争议。乙方认为工
Case: A certain company from a Chinese company (hereinafter referred to as Party A) (hereinafter referred to as Party B) On June 16, 2001, Party A and Party B signed a contract of “project contract.” The parties agreed that Party B should contract with contractor Party A’s “Chinese Merchants Office Building” project. At the same time, the two parties agreed in the contract separately that 93 sets of construction cost shall be applied to the actual settlement; and both parties shall handle the disputes due to the execution of the contract by a municipal arbitration commission in accordance with the law. After the completion of the project, both parties settled the settlement price in the project settlement. Party B thinks work