论文部分内容阅读
让我们放下这位历史学家用自己的观点来看待过去或异族文化艺术作品的问题,集中到帕诺夫斯基所认为是展示合理性的视觉形象上来;也就是说,来看看帕氏提出的形象与概念的关系。为方便起见,我们把这些关系分成宽泛与交叉的两种:第一种,视觉形象作为一个概念的范例展现在我们面前(exemplification),第二种则说,视觉形象的结构是受一种诸如哲学的或者神学的思想理论指导的。 第一种,“范例”——落实到概念下的可视性表现——包括帕氏所谓的“视觉典型”(visualtype)。一个“视觉典型”就是给视觉形式附加文学内容的一种形象;比如,
Let us put aside this historian’s question of past or alien cultural and artistic works from his own point of view, focusing on what Panovsky considers to be a visual image of legitimacy; that is to say, The relationship between the image and the concept. For the sake of convenience, we classify these relations into two kinds: broad and cross: the first is the exemplification of the visual image as a concept, the second is that the visual image is structured in such a way that, Philosophical or theological theory of theology. The first, “paradigm,” is the implementation of visual representations of concepts - including what Papal calls “visual typologies.” A “visual typical” is an image that appends the visual content to literary content; for example,