论文部分内容阅读
《百家讲坛》的风靡让我常面对这样的问题:“你们上课是不是像易中天品三国?学生是否听得很带劲?”易教授的大学讲课氛围和高中课堂自然不好相比,但这类问题却提示我们应当关注历史教学中的语言表达艺术。对于教师来说,语言是必不可少的工具。我们听优秀教师上课,有的简练有力,有的娓娓道来,有的幽默风趣……风格虽各不相同,但表情达意却都自有一套功夫。有些教师虽满腹经纶,可惜欠于表达,教学效果大打折扣。可以说,
“Lecture 100,” the popular so I often face such a problem: “Is your class is not like the three kinds of easy to heaven and Earth? Students can hear very energetic?” "Easy to teach the atmosphere of university lectures and high school class naturally poor compared However, these kinds of problems prompt us to pay attention to the art of language expression in history teaching. For teachers, language is an indispensable tool. We listen to excellent teachers in class, some concise and powerful, some Weiweidaolai, some humorous ... ... Although the different styles, but expressive but have their own set of kung fu. Although some teachers are overwhelmed by economy, they are less than optimistic and their teaching effectiveness is greatly reduced. It can be said,