论文部分内容阅读
胡适提倡白话文和白话文学,主张废除文言,但总体上来看,其观点存在着一定的偏差,论据和论述过程也有值得商榷之处,新文学派急功近利的行为一定程度上导致了新文学的直白化和艺术性欠缺。“学衡派”在极力反对白话文的基调下,也有对白话文较为合理的认识。他们并非完全排斥白话,而是反对以白话文代替文言文,主张语言的渐进并在新的历史条件下对文言进行现代化的改造。“学衡派”对新文学阵营相关论点的反驳和论争,使得新文学在发生期对于白话文和文言文的认识趋于合理化,客观上对新文学发展起到了纠偏的作用。
Hu Shi advocated vernacular and vernacular literature and advocated the abolition of classical Chinese. However, on the whole, there are some biases in his view. Arguments and expositions are worth discussing. The quick success of new literary genre has led to a certain degree of straightforwardness of new literature And artistic lacking. “Xueheng school ” strongly opposed to vernacular language, but also a more reasonable understanding of vernacular language. Instead of completely rejecting the vernacular, they are opposed to replacing the classical Chinese with vernacular, advocating a progressive language and modernizing the classical Chinese under new historical conditions. The refutation and argument between Xueheng School and other relevant arguments in the new literary camp made the understanding of the new literature in vernacular and classical Chinese rationalized and objectively corrected the development of new literature.