论文部分内容阅读
目的利用现有的监测信息资源,对基于已发表的期望寿命(Life Expectancy)数据如何实现对不同地区期望寿命评价进行方法介绍。方法采用《中国卫生统计年鉴》1990年和2000年各省的期望寿命数据,运用增分率法和综合指数法两种方法比较31个省期望寿命,举例介绍两种方法的计算过程。结果增分率法和综合指数法两种方法得出的排名结果比较接近。前五名均是上海、吉林、黑龙江、重庆、北京。增分率法排名倒数五名为:甘肃、广东、贵州、云南、河南;综合指数法排名倒数五名为:甘肃、贵州、云南、河南、广东。结论两种方法的演示,最后都实现了对31个省期望寿命的比较。并且两种计算方法结果比较接近。从指标计算简单与否来看,建议采用增分率法;从通用性来讲,可以使用综合指数法。本文对利用监测信息资料实现比较不同地区期望寿命计算提供了指导性的计算方法。
Objective To use existing monitoring information resources to introduce methodological approaches to assessing life expectancy in different regions based on published Life Expectancy data. Methods Based on the life expectancy data of China Health Statistical Yearbook 1990 and 2000, the life expectancy of 31 provinces was compared using the method of increment rate and comprehensive index, and the calculation process of the two methods was introduced. The results of the rate of increase method and the composite index method two methods come to the ranking results are relatively close. The top five are Shanghai, Jilin, Heilongjiang, Chongqing, Beijing. The last five of the ranking methods are: Gansu, Guangdong, Guizhou, Yunnan and Henan; the index of the last five is Gansu, Guizhou, Yunnan, Henan and Guangdong. Conclusions The demonstration of both methods finally achieved the comparison of expected life expectancy in 31 provinces. And the results of the two methods are relatively close. From the index calculation is simple or not, it is recommended to use the incremental method; from the versatility, you can use the composite index method. In this paper, we use the monitoring information to compare the life expectancy in different regions to provide an instructive calculation method.