论文部分内容阅读
检察长列席审判委员会制度,已成为近年来司法改革的一个热点,作为热点的东西,争议自然在所难免。但是理论争议,特别是关于合理性的分析,由于受到立场的捆绑,往往容易失之于客观。检察长列席审判委员会制度,不是说与其他制度或原则的价值取向没有任何抵牾,但问题远没有那么多,也远没有那么严重。文章试从分析有关该制度的批判入手,以一种反批判的方式,探析和检视该制度的合理性。
Attorney general to attend the trial committee system, has become a hot spot in the judicial reform in recent years, as a hot thing, controversy is inevitable. However, theoretical controversy, especially the analysis of rationality, tends to be easily lost to the objective due to the bundling of positions. Attending the system of adjudication committee does not mean that the procurator-general does not have any contradiction with the value orientation of other systems or principles, but the problems are far less and less serious. The article attempts to analyze the critique of the system and start with an anti-critical approach to examine and examine the rationality of the system.