论文部分内容阅读
资产剥离在反垄断法中有其特定的含义,经济学理论为反垄断法采用剥离制度提供了较为充分的理论基础。本文将反垄断法上资产剥离制度分为惩罚性与预防性剥离两类,并将二者进行对比,明晰各自的特征,继而分析了剥离单轨制与剥离双轨制各自的适用条件;结合我国立法与实践情况,割析了我国反垄断法选择预防性单轨制的背景、原因,同时进一步分析我国当下面临的国情、世情,综合两种剥离制度的特点以及两种轨制的优劣,建议我国适时修改反垄断法,采纳惩罚性剥离制度,选择资产剥离双轨制,以全面、有效地规制垄断、促进竞争。
The divestiture of assets has its specific meaning in the antitrust law. Economic theory provides a more adequate theoretical basis for the antitrust law to use the divestiture system. This article divides the system of asset divestment in antitrust law into two categories: punitive and preventive divestiture, compares the two and clarifies their respective characteristics, and then analyzes the applicable conditions of the two-tier system of divestment monopoly and divestiture. Combining with our country’s legislation and Practice and analyzed the background and reason why our country’s antitrust law chose preventive monorail system. At the same time, it further analyzed the characteristics of our country’s present situation, world affairs and the two types of separation system, as well as the merits and demerits of the two systems. Amendment of antitrust law, the adoption of punitive derision system, the option of stripping dual system of assets to comprehensively and effectively regulate the monopoly and promote competition.