论文部分内容阅读
目的:比较分析腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗良性卵巢肿瘤的临床疗效。方法:将85例良性卵巢肿瘤患者随机分为两组,治疗组45例,对照组40例。治疗组选用腹腔镜下良性卵巢肿瘤手术,对照组采用传统开腹手术进行。比较分析两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、肛门排气时间及术后镇痛剂使用率。结果:治疗组的肛门排气时间、住院时间、术中出血量、术后镇痛剂的使用剂量都明显低于对照组,两组手术时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:与传统开腹手术相比,腹腔镜治疗卵巢肿瘤对患者损伤小、恢复快、术后疼痛轻,是治疗该病的理想手术。
Objective: To comparatively analyze the clinical efficacy of laparoscopy and laparotomy in the treatment of benign ovarian tumors. Methods: Eighty-five patients with benign ovarian tumors were randomly divided into two groups: treatment group (45 cases) and control group (40 cases). In the treatment group, laparoscopic surgery of benign ovarian tumors was used. In the control group, conventional laparotomy was performed. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, anal exhaust time and postoperative analgesic usage were compared between the two groups. Results: The anal exhaust time, hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative analgesic dosage were significantly lower in the treatment group than those in the control group. There was no significant difference in operative time between the two groups (P> 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with traditional laparotomy, laparoscopic treatment of ovarian tumors in patients with small damage, rapid recovery, postoperative pain is light, is the ideal surgical treatment of the disease.