论文部分内容阅读
上学期,当南京市長江路小学的領導同志把学?墓ぷ饕幓莅附唤o教師們讨論的時候,單是降低留級生的此例數字一項,就接連修改了兩次:从第一次提出的8%降低到5%,又从5%降低到4%,整整相差了一倍。大家都觉得領導上最初提出的規划太保守了。不能說長江路小学的領導同志第一次提出的降低留級生的此例數字,没有根据。他們會经算了算歷年來的留級生的此例:1953学年度是10.8%,1954学年度
During the last semester, when the leading comrades at the Changjiang Road Primary School in Nanjing sent their requests to attend the seminar, the teachers simply discussed the number of repeaters and changed them twice in succession: from The first proposed 8% reduced to 5%, from 5% to 4%, a complete difference between the double. Everyone feels that the plan originally proposed on leadership is too conservative. It can not be said that the first case of leading comrades at the primary school of the Changjiang Road has lowered the number of repeaters. There is no basis for this. They will count this case of repeat students over the years: 19.8% of the year is 10.8%, 1954 school year