论文部分内容阅读
我国现行《反不正当竞争法》颁布已逾30年,且其中的相关法律规定相对较为原则抽象,故其对于层出不穷的新类型互联网竞争类纠纷而言已稍显滞后。在此情况下,法院通过司法实践所确定的更为具体的规则将具有重要意义。但因竞争纠纷案件的绝对数量远远少于版权案件,相关法院尚未在大量案例分析的基础上形成指导意见或司法解释等规范性意见,故现行判决中针对个案所提出的一些做法值得互联网企业重视。通过梳理近10年来与
China’s current Anti-Unfair Competition Law has been promulgated for more than 30 years and the relevant laws and regulations in it are relatively abstract and abstract. Therefore, it has lagged behind the endless stream of new types of Internet competition disputes. Under such circumstances, the more specific rules that the court determines through judicial practice will be of great importance. However, because the absolute number of competition disputes is far less than the number of copyright cases, the relevant courts have not yet formed normative opinions such as guidance and judicial interpretations on the basis of a large number of case analyzes. Therefore, some cases put forward by the current judgments are worth Internet companies Pay attention. By combing nearly 10 years with