论文部分内容阅读
顾海兵撰文指出,中国的学术界存在严重的不公正、不公平、不公开的问题,已经产生相当的腐败,这已是社会公认的事实。说明我们的现行学术管理制度含有严重的设计缺陷,说明在计划经济时期建立起来的这一套制度已经不能适应市场经济发展的需求。因此,当我们对各种学术不良行为进行道义谴责、愤怒声讨的时候,我们更应该做点真正的学术分析,对现行的学术管理制度进行改革。因为:(1)古今中外的社会科学研究(除了史书),其成果能达到诺贝尔奖级,能历经千百年依旧产生巨大影响的,从来不是计划出来的,也不是什么基金资助出来的;(2)如果进行科学基金资助,则究竟什么项目可以资助、
Gu Haibing's article points out that there is a serious problem of unfairness, unfairness and non-disclosure in China's academia and that corrupt practices have already occurred. This is a fact recognized by society. This shows that our existing academic management system contains serious design flaws, indicating that this system set up during the planned economy can no longer meet the needs of market economy development. Therefore, when we conduct moral condemnation of various academic misconduct and denounce our anger, we should instead do a true academic analysis to reform the existing academic management system. Because: (1) Social and scientific research at all times and in all countries (except for history books) can achieve the Nobel Prize in its achievements; it can never have been planned out and has not been funded by the fund since the huge impact that it can still exert over thousands of years; 2) What projects can be funded if they are funded by the Science Fund?