论文部分内容阅读
温权在《学习与探索》2014年第6期撰文指出,克尔凯郭尔认为,反讽的辩证法是始于自身并归于自身的绝对否定过程,它对自身不确定性的否定,同样也是不确定的。与黑格尔的精神辩证法不同,克尔凯郭尔没有从对经验的抽象中寻求唯一出路的欲求,相反,他以更广阔的可能性涵盖了之前的不确定性。这表明,与黑格尔相比,克尔凯郭尔的反讽意味着更大的开放性。一般而言,黑格尔凭借绝对精神的逻辑演绎,为经验上升至抽象的具
According to Kierkegaard, Kierkegaard argues that the dialectic of irony is an absolute negation process that begins with itself and belongs to itself. It also rejects the uncertainty of itself definite. Unlike Hegel’s dialectics of the spirit, Kierkegaard did not seek the only way out of the abstract abstraction of the experience; instead, he covered the earlier uncertainties with a wider range of possibilities. This shows that, compared with Hegel, Kierkegaard’s irony means greater openness. In general, Hegel’s interpretation of the logic of the absolute spirit, for the experience rose to abstract