论文部分内容阅读
业内人士也许都有过这样的经验:在编制一个城市总体规划的时候,一般都要绘制“土地使用现状图”和“土地使用规划图”。当我们把这两张图放在一起作比较的,可以看到现状图中的地块通常都比较小而且布局零乱,道路网可能支离破碎,不成系统;而规划图中的用地则比较大而且整齐,按照规范重新划定的道路网十分规整。在土地使用规划图中,除了新规划地块大而整齐之外,那些原有小而散乱的现状地块也大部分被重新规划的大色块覆盖。很久以来,我们对此习以为常,认为规划就应该是这
Insiders may have had the experience that when drawing up a master plan for a city, they generally have to draw “land use map” and “land use plan map.” When we put these two figures together for comparison, we can see that the plots in the status quo map are usually small and the layout is disorderly. The road network may be fragmented and fragmented, and the plot in the plan is larger and tidy , In accordance with norms to redraw the road network is very structured. In the land use plan, in addition to the large and neatly planned new plots, most of the plots of small and scattered status quo are also largely covered by re-planned large patches of color. For a long time, we are accustomed to this, think the plan should be this