论文部分内容阅读
“转变经济发展方式”是决定中国现代化命运的重大抉择。通过对经济学界有关该问题讨论的梳理,我们发现存在着两种对立的研究思路:一种是自由派所主张的市场化的、外向型的、依附性的研究思路,他们从批判传统计划经济体制着手,要求进一步推进市场化、私有化和全球化;而另一种是反自由派所坚持的政府指导的、内源型的、自主性的研究思路,他们从出口导向型发展战略的弊端和改革开放进程中出现的新问题出发,提倡实施“国内大循环”经济发展战略,强化政府指导和保护,建立独立自主的国民经济体系。这两种研究思路的尖锐对立源于对新自由主义经济学的不同态度,并体现在他们对于发展战略、转变路径和转变对策的不同看法上。
“Transforming the mode of economic development” is a major decision that determines the fate of China’s modernization. By combing the discussion about this issue in the field of economics, we find that there exist two kinds of opposite research ideas: one is the market-oriented, extroverted and dependent research ideas advocated by the liberals, who criticize the traditional planned economy Institutionalized and demanded the further promotion of marketization, privatization and globalization; the other is directed by the anti-liberalism, endogenous, autonomous research ideas, their drawbacks from the export-oriented development strategy And the new problems that emerged in the process of reform and opening up, we should advocate the implementation of the strategy of “domestic circulation” and economic development, strengthen government guidance and protection, and establish an independent national economy. The sharp opposition between the two approaches stems from the different attitudes toward neo-liberal economics and from their different perspectives on development strategies, changing paths and changing responses.