论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨气囊助产这一新式产科助产技术在计划分娩中的临床应用价值。方法:对我院2013年1月—2013年8月入院待产的产妇200例,随机分为对照组100例,观察组100例(应用气囊助产技术),观察两组的产程,分娩方式,产后2h出血量。结果:1产程时间比较,观察组:第一产程、第二产程、总产程时间分别为(4.5±3.42)h,(0.42±0.32)h,(5.09±2.21)h;对照组:第一产程、第二产程、总产程时间分别为(13.1±7.34)h,(1.11±0.58)h,(14.38±3.65)h;2产后出血比较,观察组:产后出血3例,产后出血率为3%;对照组:产后出血10例,产后出血率为10%;3剖宫产率比较,观察组:阴道分娩80例,剖宫产20例,剖宫产率为20%;对照组:阴道分娩68例,剖宫产32例,剖宫产率为32%,以上三项指标观察组与对照组有明显统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论:气囊助产可以明显缩短产程,减轻产妇痛苦,提高阴道分娩率,降低剖宫产率,减少产后出血量。
Objective: To investigate the clinical value of airway midwifery as a new obstetric midwifery in planned delivery. Methods: A total of 200 maternal women admitted to hospital from January 2013 to August 2013 were randomly divided into control group (n = 100) and observation group (n = 100) (balloon assisted delivery technique). The duration of labor, delivery mode, Postpartum 2h bleeding. Results: The duration of labor in the observation group was (4.5 ± 3.42) h, (0.42 ± 0.32) h, (5.09 ± 2.21) h respectively in the observation group: the first stage of labor, the second stage of labor, (13.1 ± 7.34) h, (1.11 ± 0.58) h, (14.38 ± 3.65) h, respectively; 2 postpartum hemorrhage, the observation group: 3 cases of postpartum hemorrhage, postpartum hemorrhage rate was 3% ; Control group: 10 cases of postpartum hemorrhage, postpartum hemorrhage rate was 10%; 3 cesarean section rate comparison group: vaginal delivery in 80 cases, 20 cases of cesarean section, cesarean section rate was 20%; control group: vaginal delivery 68 cases, 32 cases of cesarean section, cesarean section rate of 32%, the above three indicators of observation group and control group were significantly different (P <0.05). Conclusion: Air sac midwifery can significantly shorten the labor process, reduce maternal pain, improve vaginal delivery rate, reduce the rate of cesarean section and reduce the amount of postpartum hemorrhage.