论文部分内容阅读
本文从句法角度对汉语语气范畴标记的句法地位、句法分布和生成限制问题进行了分析,发现:语气范畴标记尽管存在句法分布差异,但具有相同的句法功能和句法生成位置,同一类型的语气词在同一句法位置进入句法结构,但不同类型的语气词在不同的句法位置进入句法结构;语气词具有标示句类的功能,因而位于C位置;陈述句是其他句类生成的基础,因此,疑问、祈使和感叹语气词可与陈述语气词同现并置于其后;然而,在内嵌小句中,疑问、祈使和感叹语气词均不能出现。语气词在句法层级中的位置存在等级差异,在句子结构中呈线性排列。本文的结论得到了跨语言的证明。
This paper analyzes the syntactic status, syntactic distribution and generative constraints of Chinese tone category markers from syntactic perspectives. It is found that despite the differences in syntax distribution, the tone category markers have the same syntactic functions and syntactic generating positions, and the same type of modal particles But the different types of modal particles enter the syntactic structure at different syntactic positions. The modal particles have the function of marking the sentences and thus are located in the C position. The statements are the basis for the generation of other sentences. Therefore, questions, Imperatives and exclamations can be co-morphed with and delineated by the modal particles; however, none of the interrogatives, prayers, and exclamations can appear in the inline sentences. There are level differences in the position of the modal particles in the syntactic level, which are linearly arranged in the sentence structure. The conclusion of this paper has been cross-language proof.