论文部分内容阅读
司法公信力的匮乏是当下中国不容忽略的事实,而建立和完善判例制度可以在一定程度上提升司法公信力。判例制度通过满足人们的司法期待,在一定程度和范围内解决司法不公、裁判不一和司法无权威等问题,促进司法公信力的形成。但是,在判例制度与司法公信力的生成之间并没有一种逻辑的必然性,而只是人们在司法运行中所形成的一种习惯性认识。当下中国所倡导的案例指导制度有益于司法公信力的提升,但它并不必然地促进司法公信力的改观。案例指导制度的发展方向应该是弥漫性的判例法。
The lack of judicial credibility is a fact that can not be neglected in present China, and establishing and improving the precedent system can improve the credibility of the judiciary to a certain extent. The case law system solves the problems of judicial injustice, referee judgment and judicial authoritylessness to meet the people’s judicial expectation to a certain extent and scope, and promotes the formation of judicial credibility. However, there is no logical necessity between the precedent system and the formation of the judicial credibility. It is only a kind of habitual understanding that people form in judicial operation. At present the case guidance system advocated by China is beneficial to the promotion of judicial credibility, but it does not necessarily promote the improvement of judicial credibility. The direction of the case guidance system should be diffuse case law.