论文部分内容阅读
人们普遍认为,在医院发生的心肺骤停都应进行复苏,它似乎是病人的一种权利,否则就可能诉之于法律,这种情形在ICU 病房最为明显。心肺复苏的效果取决于心跳骤停的病理基础、发病时间和复苏方法。一个身体健康状况良好的人,施行心脏导管插入术时心跳骤停,心肺复苏的成功率很高,而心源性休克或晚期心力衰竭病人复苏的效果很差。由此,将心跳骤停分为“原发”(由心脏的电控突然停止引起,和“继发”(心脏的泵功能已发生
It is generally accepted that cardiopulmonary arrest in hospitals should be resuscitated and appears to be a patient’s right, otherwise lawsuits may be sued, most notably in ICU wards. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation depends on the pathophysiology of cardiac arrest, onset time and recovery methods. A healthy person who has a cardiac arrest during a cardiac catheterization has a high rate of successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation and a poor recovery from cardiogenic shock or advanced heart failure. As a result, cardiac arrest is divided into “primary” (caused by a sudden halt of the heart’s electrical control and “secondary” (cardiac pump function has taken place