论文部分内容阅读
一、有些类目设置不当。《中图法》第三版第二表中“D(9)7诉讼法”中的下位类“D(9)71制度与方法”类分出的下位类中,把“D(9)71.6审判”与“D(9)71.8诉讼程序”列为同位类,这是不妥当的,既是同位类,就是指由一个类直接区分出来的各个平行类,彼此之间称为同位类。同位类之间是互相排斥,互不相容的。且概念间的外延全部不重合。凡是能分入某一类的图书,一般不能归入它的同位类,而“审判”是“诉讼程序”的一个中心阶段,是从属于“诉讼程序”的,它们之间应是上下位类
First, some categories set properly. In the second table of the third edition of the Chinese Library Classification, in the lower class of “D (9) 7 Procedural Law” and “D (9) 71 systems and methods”, the “ D (9) 71.6 Judgment ”D and D“ (9) 71.8 Litigation ”It is not appropriate to classify as a co-ordinate class, either as a co-ordinated class or as a parallel class that is directly distinguished by a class from each other Inter-class known as. Isotopic classes are mutually exclusive and mutually exclusive. And the concept of all the extensions do not coincide. All books that can be classified into a certain category can not generally be classified as belonging to the same category, and “trial” is a central stage in “proceedings” and is subordinated to “proceedings” Between the upper and lower category should be