论文部分内容阅读
一、交流需要“据理力争”交流拒绝过多的“平和”。在学生探究活动中对某一问题有不同看法,且各据其理、互不相让时,可让学生进行争辩,打破学生举手、教师点名的老方式,鼓励学生大胆阐明自己的观点,做到问题不辩不明。提倡“据理力争”,有利于求得正确的认识、深层的理解,学生在相互交流中极易萌发灵感,发现新知,激活思维的火花,达到“风乍起,吹皱一池春水”的境地。
First, exchanges need to “argumentally argue” that exchanges reject too much “peace.” When students have different views on a question in the student’s inquiry activities, and when they are in accordance with each other’s reasoning, they can allow students to argue, break the old ways of raising their hands and teachers, and encourage students to boldly articulate their views. It is not clear to the question. Advocating “arguing through arguments” is conducive to obtaining correct understanding and deep understanding. Students can easily inspire in their mutual exchanges, discover new knowledge, and activate the spark of thinking, so as to achieve “the wind is blowing up and the wind is blowing in a pool of water”. situation.