论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨妇科炎症感染中微生物检验方法的临床效果。方法 116例妇科炎症患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,各58例。对照组采用培养法进行微生物检验,观察组采用凝集法进行微生物检验,观察对比两组的检验效果。结果对照组患者中检验结果呈阳性48例,阴性10例,阳性率为82.76%(48/58);观察组患者中检验结果呈阳性51例,阴性7例,阳性率为87.93%(51/58),两组检出阳性率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),两种检测方法检出阳性率都比较高。结论对妇科炎症感染的患者采用微生物检验方法进行检测的效果显示,凝集法和培养法的效果均较好,确保了检验结果的准确度,值得推广。
Objective To investigate the clinical effect of microbial test in gynecological inflammation. Methods 116 cases of gynecological inflammation were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 58 cases each. In the control group, the culture method was used for the microbiological examination. The observation group was tested by the agglutination method for microbiological examination. The test results were compared between the two groups. Results In the control group, the test results were positive in 48 cases and negative in 10 cases, the positive rate was 82.76% (48/58). In the observation group, 51 cases were positive and 7 cases were negative, the positive rate was 87.93% (51 / 58). There was no significant difference in the positive rate between the two groups (P> 0.05). The positive rates of the two methods were all higher. Conclusion The results of microbiological test in patients with gynecological inflammation showed that the effect of agglutination and culture were better, which ensured the accuracy of the test results and worthy of promotion.