论文部分内容阅读
从1995年以来,中国民间对日索赔工作取得了不小的进展,不少日本地方法院以公平、正义的法律基本原则否定了日本政府及其相关公司所谓超过“时效”和“除斥”的无理抗辩。2003年1月15日日本京都地方法院在中国劳工诉日本政府及日本冶金业株式会社损害赔偿案中更是首次否定了“国家无答责”的适用。其后,在日本东京高等法院、福冈高等法院及新泻地方法院的多件判决中.均同样否定了日本政府坚持的“国家无答责”的观点。正值诉讼案取得进展之时,日本最高法院于
Since 1995, no significant progress has been made in China’s civil claim against Japan. Many Japanese district courts have denied the Japanese government and its related companies the so-called “aging” and “” divisions in accordance with the basic principles of fairness and justice. Reprimand “unreasonable defense. On January 15, 2003, for the first time, the Japanese District Court in Kyoto denied the application of ”state no-answer“ in the case of the China Labor Tribunal against Japan and the Japan Metallurgical Industry Co., Ltd. for damages. Since then, the judgments in Japan’s Tokyo High Court, the Fukuoka High Court and the Niigata District Court similarly rejected the Japanese government’s insistence that ”no blame for the state". At a time when the lawsuit is making progress, the Supreme Court of Japan said