论文部分内容阅读
目的比较药物安抚治疗与保守治疗对急性牙髓炎的疗效。方法将120受试对象随机分为药物安抚治疗组与保守治组,每组60人,药物组给予甲硝唑、地塞米松液加复方磺胺甲噁唑,保守组采用髓引流术。2周后根患者的疼痛来判断治疗。结果药物安抚治疗组的疗效与保守治疗组有明显的统计学差异P=0.004<0.05。结论药物安抚治疗急性牙髓炎的效果优于保守治疗。
Objective To compare the efficacy of drug appeasement and conservative treatment on acute pulpitis. Methods 120 subjects were randomly divided into drug appeasement treatment group and conservative treatment group, with 60 patients in each group. Metronidazole, dexamethasone plus sulfamethoxazole were given to the drug group, and medullary drainage was used in the conservative group. 2 weeks after the root pain to judge the treatment. Results drug appeasement treatment group and conservative treatment group had significant statistical difference P = 0.004 <0.05. Conclusions The effect of drug appeasement on acute pulpitis is better than that of conservative treatment.