论文部分内容阅读
日本《史学杂志》第99编第5号载文回顾1989年日本史学界所取得的成就。现将有关元史及蒙古史部分编译如下,供有关学者参考。在元史研究方面有植松正的《关于元代江南的地方官任用》(《法制史研究》38),该文认为,在元朝攻克南宋后30年间,江南的地方官多为投降的南人。此后,为了防止当地的豪强勾结和世袭化的弊端,对选用南人进行了限制,结果导致了人才不足的局面,于是元朝将重开科举作为一项改变这种局面的策略而实行。这对以往认为重开科举是顺应儒生的期望及对汉人的怀柔,是一个新的见解。粤崎裕司的《支持元末方国珍之乱的戴氏》(《中国古代史研究》6)追述了元
Japan’s “History Magazine” No. 99, No. 5, a review of the Japanese historians in 1989 made achievements. The history of Yuan Dynasty and Mongolian history will now be compiled as follows for reference by relevant scholars. In the study of the history of Yuan Dynasty, there was Uematsu Masanori, “About the Local Officials in the South of the Yangtze River in the Yuan Dynasty” (Research on the History of Legal History38). This article argues that during the 30 years after the Yuan Dynasty’s capture of the Southern Song Dynasty, many local officials in the south of the Yangtze River were surrendering South Koreans. Since then, in order to prevent local tyrannical collusion and hereditary shortcomings, the restrictions on the selection of the South have led to a shortage of talents. As a result, the Yuan Dynasty will resume the imperial civil examinations as a tactic to change this situation. This is a new idea that the re-examination of the imperial civil examinations in the past was a response to the expectations of the Confucian scholars and to the Han Chinese. Yuetzaki Yusuke’s “Dai’s support for the chaos in the late Yuan Fangzhen” (“Study of Ancient Chinese History” 6)