论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨α干扰素(IFNα)中和抗体产生的规律及其意义。方法:采用抗病毒中和生物测定法检测32例健康人和116例IFNα治疗的慢性肝炎患者血清中的IFNα的中和抗体(NA)。结果:健康人及IFNα治疗前的患者均未检出NA。治疗后共20例(172%)阳性,其中4例是在治疗后第2个月检出,20例第6个月全部阳性,IFN-α2a、IFN-α2b、IFN-α1b治疗组的NA阳性率分别为346%、132%、115%。NA阳性组、NA高滴度组的病毒清除率显著低于NA阴性组、NA低滴度组(P<001),相反病毒复发率在NA阳性组显著高于NA阴性组(P<005)。治疗前ALT高水平组的NA阳性率显著低于ALT低水平组(P<005),而前者的病毒阴转率显著高于后者(P<005)。结论:提示IFNα治疗后NA发生率较低,其产生有一定的时间规律。NA可影响治疗效果,对治疗前ALT水平的了解有助于病例的选择
Objective: To investigate the regularity and significance of the production of neutralizing antibodies (IFNα). Methods: Neutralizing antibodies (NA) in serum of 32 healthy individuals and 116 patients with chronic hepatitis treated with IFNα were detected by antiviral neutralization bioassay. Results: No NA was detected in healthy individuals and patients before IFNα treatment. After treatment, a total of 20 cases (172%) were positive, of which 4 cases were detected at the second month after treatment, 20 cases were all 6 months positive, IFN-α2a, IFN-α2b, IFN-α1b treatment group The positive rates of NA were 346%, 132% and 115% respectively. NA positive group and NA high titer group were significantly lower than those in NA negative group and NA low titer group (P <001). In contrast, the virus recurrence rate in NA positive group was significantly higher than that in NA negative group (P < 0 05). The positive rate of NA in high ALT group before treatment was significantly lower than that in ALT low group (P <005), while the former was significantly higher than the latter (P <005). Conclusion: It suggests that the incidence of NAA after IFNα treatment is low, and its production has a certain time pattern. NA can affect the treatment effect, understanding the level of pre-treatment ALT contributes to the choice of case