论文部分内容阅读
李恒全同志认为张家山汉简《二年律令.户律》受田宅的实施对象是汉初军队复员人员,这一观点值得商榷。据律文所示,政府授田或个人占田数量多少,只是根据户主的爵次和身份等级,与军功没有必然联系。形成这种情况的原因,主要是汉初大规模战争已经结束,授爵途径开始呈现多样化特点,即由军功授爵逐渐向事功授爵、国家赐爵、以德赐爵、因亲封爵、继承等方面转化。《二年律令.户律》是国家授田和限田的一般标准,显然与高帝五年诏“法以功劳行田宅”的制度有着不同的性质。
Comrade Li Hengquan thought that the view of Zhang Jian Shan Han Jian’s “second year law order and household law” subject to the implementation of Tianzhai was the demobilization of the Han troops in the early Han Dynasty. This view is debatable. According to the essay, whether the government grants land or individuals a certain amount of land accounts is not necessarily linked to military power, based only on the headship and status of the head of household. The reason for the formation of this situation is that the large-scale war in Han Dynasty was over and the diversionary route began to show diversification. That is, graduated from military power to military power, Jazz, inheritance and other aspects of conversion. The “two-year decrees and laws” are the general criteria for the granting of land and limited land by the state and apparently have a different nature from that of the emperor Gauthier’s five-year “law applying merit to the land.”