论文部分内容阅读
自主体性哲学遭受批判以来,基于传统主客二元划分基础上的思想政治教育也难免遭牵连。究竟教育者与受教育者何者才是思想政治教育的主体,学界莫衷一是。然而,当前的争论虽然激烈,却于三个基本的问题上并未作出必要的区分:区分实践层面的错误与理论本身的错误;区分认识主体和价值主体;区分教育过程和学习过程。此外,学界对教育者作为思想政治教育的唯一主体的一些批判,也有必要重新审视。教育者作为思想政治教育唯一的认识主体是思想政治教育理论与实践的双重需要。
Since the philosophy of self-criticism has been criticized, the ideological and political education based on the traditional duality of subject and object has inevitably been implicated. After all, what kind of educators and educators is the main body of ideological and political education. However, the current debate, though intense, does not make the necessary distinction on the three basic issues: the distinction between mistakes in practice and the mistakes of the theory itself; the distinction between the subject of knowledge and the subject of value; and the distinction between the educational process and the learning process. In addition, some criticisms of educators as the only subject of ideological and political education are also necessary to be revisited. Educators, as the only main body of cognition in ideological and political education, are the dual needs of the theory and practice of ideological and political education.