论文部分内容阅读
调查对象:高二文科236位学生。调查方式:自愿、无记名,但要求写出个人真实的学习感受。调查背景:新教材、新课标的推行。调查目的:进一步反思教材、教法、学法。调查时间:期中考试结束之后。整理方式:把学生们原始表达方式中相同或相近的感受整理成同一板块,本人给同一板块附上小标题并在“※”号后略表感慨。我们困惑都说学习哲学可以活跃思维,启动智慧,丰富生活;哲学是一位不会说话的老师,会使我们懂得许多道理,让人聪明。于是,我秉着这种理念和执著长久地啃着由抽象浓缩而成的教材,拼
Survey respondents: 236 students in the sophomore liberal arts. Method of investigation: Voluntary and anonymous, but it requires writing an individual’s real learning experience. Investigation background: Implementation of new teaching materials and new curriculum standards. The purpose of the survey: to further reflect on teaching materials, teaching methods, learning methods. Survey time: After the midterm exam is over. Sorting: Organize the same or similar feelings in the students’ original expressions into the same section. I attach the subtitles to the same section and express my feelings after the “※”. We are puzzled to say that learning philosophy can activate thinking, initiate wisdom, and enrich life. Philosophy is a non-speaking teacher that will make us understand many truths and make people smart. So, I hold on to this concept and persistence for a long time to swear by the abstract condensed material.