论文部分内容阅读
一、风格的界定和研究方法在着手这一命题的论证时,就会发现,我们陷入了一个无法摆脱的困境。追溯某一事物的成因,其前提是确认该事物的存在。然而,“人艺风格”本身就是有待论证的问题。什么是人艺风格?究竟有无人艺风格?这些问题多年来争论不休、众口不一。要去论证一个不知是否存在于世间的事物的成因,不是一种逻辑上的悖谬吗? 要摆脱困境,走出逻辑上的悖谬,只有另辟蹊径。在此之前,似乎有必要对人艺风格争论的症结作一简要浏览,并规范一下“风格”这一术语的内涵。
First, the definition of style and research methods In the argument to proceed with this proposition, we will find that we are caught in a dilemma that can not get rid of. Trace the cause of a thing, the premise is to confirm the existence of the thing. However, “art style” itself is an issue to be demonstrated. What is art style? Are there any art style? These issues have been debated over the years, different. It is not a logical paradox to justify the cause of a thing that does not exist in the world? Only to find another way out of the predicament and out of logical absurdity. Prior to this, it seems necessary to make a brief overview of the crux of the style controversy and to regulate the meaning of the term “style.”