论文部分内容阅读
在使用FIDIC合同1999版、2005、2006和2010版的情况下,(监理)工程师和业主均将28天视为承包商索赔的索赔时效,并要求承包商出示证明28天提出书面索赔通知的证据,用以证明承包商在28天内发出书面索赔通知,从而有权索赔工期延长和/或额外费用。中国承包商错失索赔时效的主要原因超过索赔通知时间造成承包商丧失索赔权利的现象普遍存在于中国企业中。经分析,其主要原因在于以下几点。
In the case of the 1999, 2005, 2006 and 2010 FIDIC contracts, both the Engineer and the proprietor consider the 28 days as a limitation of time for the contractor’s claim and require the contractor to produce evidence of a written notice of claim for 28 days To prove that the contractor issues a written notice of claim within 28 days, thereby being entitled to claim an extension of the period and / or additional costs. The main reason for the Chinese contractors ’failure to claim the limitation of validity is that the contractors’ right to claim losses over the claims notice period is widespread in Chinese enterprises. After analysis, the main reason is that the following points.