论文部分内容阅读
奴隶制研究这一问题,在五、六十年代曾引起热烈讨论,近年来又有新的发展,越来越多的研究者承认或逐步认识到:就世界的范围来看,奴隶制社会不但不是每一个国家和每一个民族在历史发展过程中必然要经过的阶段,而且其存在甚至不具有普遍性。尽管在具体的认识上分歧甚多,但这一点却逐渐成为人们的共识。奴隶制研究有很多难点。关健的难点是奴隶和农奴至今尚未有一个人们所公认的、能够涵盖所有史实和“混沌表象”的明确划分标准。就个人所看到的文章来说,感觉无论哪种观点都有一定道理,但也都有比较明
The question of slavery research has aroused heated discussions in the 1950s and 1960s and new developments have taken place in recent years. More and more researchers recognize or gradually realize that in terms of the scope of the world, slavery society not only It is not the stage that every country and every nation must go through in the process of historical development, and its existence is not even universal. Although there are many differences in the specific understanding, but it has gradually become the consensus of people. Slavery research has many difficulties. The crux of the matter is that so far none of the slaves and serfs have been recognized as such, and can cover all the historical facts and the clear demarcation of the “chaotic appearance.” As far as personal articles are concerned, I feel no matter what kind of views have some truth, but also have more obvious