论文部分内容阅读
共同正犯没有实施该当构成要件的完整行为,却要将造成的结果全部归责于各行为人,也即共同正犯适用“一部行为全部责任”的原则进行结果归责。一般认为,共同正犯适用“一部行为全部责任”的原则进行结果归责,是由于共同正犯者之间存在共同性。而根据传统的理论,共同性的根据在于客观上共同实施了行为,主观上具有意思联络。其中,意思联络更被认为是共同正犯之共同性存在必不可少的要素。但是,由于过失犯不具有对结果的认识、意欲,也即不具有相互间的意思联络,因此,过失共同正犯共同性问题成为了过失共同正犯成立与否的关键。
If a common principal does not carry out the complete act of constituting the necessary elements, he will have to blame the result on the perpetrator, that is, the principle that a common criminal applies “one act of full responsibility”. It is generally believed that the result of the principle that common offenders apply the principle of “full responsibility for one act” is due to the commonality between common offenders. According to the traditional theory, the basis for commonality lies in the objectively implementing the act together and subjectively connecting with each other. Among them, the meaning of contact is even more considered to be an integral part of common criminals exist essential elements. However, since the wrongdoers do not have the knowledge of the result, the desire, that is, they do not have the liaison with each other. Therefore, the common negligence of common criminality has become the key to the establishment of a common negligent criminal.