论文部分内容阅读
本文在分析飞鱼村与红河司村因合并引发地权纠纷及该纠纷以上访方式解决的基础上,对现有村庄制度决定了农村地权纠纷救济模式的选择,且法律救济渠道的畅通和制度功能的实现是摒弃上访途径的必要前提进行了探讨。具体而言,在当前农村社会中,村民委员会的基层政权化堵塞了和解、调解与行政裁决的救济渠道、法院职能的行政化弱化了诉讼救济渠道的公信力、仲裁制度的缺失与陌生影响了农民对该模式的选择、法律救济成本过高的现实考量和制度功能未能有效发挥使农民选择了上访模式,地权纠纷救济的现实对策是疏通救济渠道、降低救济成本、充分发挥法律制度功能,其未来走向是完善救济制度、加强配套措施、全面提升法律救济意识。
Based on the analysis of the disputes arising from the merger between Flying Fish Village and Honghe Si Village and the settlement of the disputes, the existing village system decides the choice of remedy mode of rural land ownership disputes and the unblocked legal remedy channel and system The realization of function is to discard the necessary prerequisites for petitions. Specifically, in the current rural society, the grassroots political power of village committees has blocked the channels of relief for reconciliation, mediation and administrative adjudication. The administration of court functions has weakened the credibility of litigation relief channels. The absence of arbitration system and unfamiliar influence on peasants The selection of this model, the factual consideration of the high legal remedy cost and the failure of the system function to make the peasants choose petition mode effectively are the realistic measures to remedy the land dispute, which is to clear the channel of relief, reduce the cost of relief, give full play to the function of the legal system, Its future direction is to perfect the relief system, strengthen supporting measures and raise awareness of legal relief in an all-round way.