论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨不同剖宫产缝合方式对子宫切口瘢痕憩室形成的影响。方法选取2014年3月至2015年9月东莞市第五人民医院收治的365例择期行剖宫产产妇作为研究对象,按随机数字表法将其分为对照组和研究组。研究组产妇剖宫产切口采用双层连续缝合,对照组产妇剖宫产切口采用单层连续缝合。比较两组产妇憩室肌层厚度、憩室形成例数、憩室容积、术中出血量、手术时间、肛门排气时间、术后恶露持续时间及住院时间。结果两组术中出血量、手术时间、肛门排气时间、术后恶露持续时间及住院时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组产妇憩室形成率(3.83%)与憩室容积[(0.36±0.12)mL]低于对照组[9.34%,(0.49±0.09)mL],憩室肌层厚度[(7.63±1.92)mm]高于对照组[(5.48±2.51)mm],差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论双层连续缝合有利于剖宫产切口愈合,瘢痕憩室程度可得到改善。
Objective To investigate the effect of different cesarean section suture methods on the formation of scar diverticulum in uterine incision. Methods From March 2014 to September 2015, 365 cases of elective cesarean section in Dongguan Fifth People’s Hospital were enrolled in this study. According to the random number table, they were divided into control group and study group. Study group maternal cesarean section incision with double continuous suture, the control group maternal cesarean section incision with a single continuous suture. The thickness of muscular diverticulum, the number of diverticula formed, the volume of diverticulum, the amount of blood loss during operation, the operation time, the time of anal exhaust, the duration of postoperative lochia and hospital stay were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in bleeding volume, operation time, anal exhaust time, duration of postoperative lochia and hospital stay between the two groups (P> 0.05). The incidence of maternal diverticulum (3.83%) and diverticulum volume (0.36 ± 0.12) mL in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group (9.34%, 0.49 ± 0.09) mL and 7.66 ± 1.92 mm In the control group [(5.48 ± 2.51) mm], the differences were statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Double continuous suture is helpful for cesarean section incision healing, and the degree of scar diverticulum can be improved.