论文部分内容阅读
作为美国的主要盟友,英国和美国一样主张战俘的“非强制遣返”。但是英国出于促成尽快停战,应对议会下院反对派的压力和确保英国及英联邦国家的战俘尽快安全获释的考虑,英国保守党政府不仅反对强制遣返,也反对强制扣留战俘。而且与丘吉尔首相过分强调战俘遣返问题的“人道”立场、政治价值及英美特殊关系不同,艾登主导的外交部主张抑制美国在战俘遣返问题上的僵硬立场,意欲灵活处理战俘问题,打开停战谈判僵局。英国既非强制遣返、也非强制扣留战俘的立场,以及其在东西方之间的斡旋,在一定程度上有助于战俘遣返问题的解决。
As a major ally of the United States, Britain and the United States share the same idea of “non-mandatory repatriation” of prisoners of war. However, in the interest of facilitating an armistice as soon as possible, responding to pressure from the opposition in the lower house of parliament and ensuring the safe release of prisoners of war in the British and Commonwealth countries, the British Conservative government opposed not only mandatory repatriation but also forced detention of prisoners of war. And unlike the “humane” position, political value and special Anglo-Silla relationship that Foreign Minister Churchill has overemphasized on the issue of the return of prisoners of war, Aiden’s leading Foreign Ministry has advocated suppressing the United States rigid position on the issue of the return of prisoners of war and is willing to flexibly handle the issue of prisoners of war and open Armistice negotiations deadlock. Britain’s neither the mandatory repatriation nor the imposition of the detention of prisoners of war and its good offices between the East and the West can, to a certain extent, help solve the issue of the return of prisoners of war.