论文部分内容阅读
目的构建实用性及操作性强的卫生监督统计指标体系。方法 2011年9月-11月采用德尔菲专家咨询法对指标的实用性、代表性进行评价,利用问卷调查法对指标的操作性进行评价,利用制定的评价原则对指标进行实用性与操作性评价。结果评价出实用性及操作性较强的卫生监督统计指标57个,两轮专家咨询的积极系数均为100.00%,操作性指标的积极系数也为100.00%;专家权威程度两轮分别为0.75和0.79;协调系数第一轮专家咨询实用性为0.27、代表性为0.24,第二轮实用性为0.23、代表性为0.22(P<0.05)。结论评价出的实用性卫生监督统计指标体系较为实用、可靠,可用于评价卫生监督工作。
Objective To construct practical and operational indicators of health surveillance statistics. Methods From September to November in 2011, Delphi’s expert consultation method was used to evaluate the practicability and representativeness of indicators, and the questionnaire method was used to evaluate the operability of indicators. The evaluation criteria were used to evaluate the practicability and operability of indicators Evaluation. The results of the evaluation of practical and operational health oversight statistical indicators 57, two rounds of consultation experts have a positive coefficient of 100.00%, the positive index of operational indicators is also 100.00%; expert authority two rounds were 0.75 and 0.79; The first round of coordination coefficient consultants practicality is 0.27, the representativeness is 0.24, the second round of practicality is 0.23, the representativeness is 0.22 (P <0.05). Conclusion The practical indicator system of health supervision and evaluation is more practical and reliable, which can be used to evaluate the health supervision.