论文部分内容阅读
近几年,一些党史刊物为更加适应改革开放,在总结过去经验的基础上,作了调整,取得了一些成绩,尤其是在可读性上下了一番功夫,但在有所得的同时,刊物过去的学术性特色削弱了,这不能不令人遗憾。注意文章的可读性无疑是对的,但可读性和学术性并不全然矛盾,仅是一个问题的两面不同而已,学术性是内在的核,而可读性仅是一个载体,如果学术性不强,文章就给人轻浮的感觉。我们应该把一些我们党历史上的重大斗争、事件、活动向人们做宣传,在此同时,我们还要对我们
In recent years, some party history publications have made adjustments and achieved some successes especially in readability in order to be more comfortable with the reform and opening up. On the basis of summing up past experiences, some party history publications have taken some time to accomplish this goal. However, The past scholarly features of the publication have weakened, which must not be regrettable. Attention to the readability of the article is undoubtedly right, but readability and academic are not completely contradictory, only one problem is different on both sides, academic is the inner core, and readability is only a carrier, if the academic Sex is not strong, the article gives a frivolous feeling. We should publicize some major battles, events and activities in the history of our party. At the same time, we must also give our