论文部分内容阅读
本文倡议“圣经接受史”的学术研究,并以“互文性”作为分析工具,尝试开拓圣经学与文学(尤其鲁迅学)的跨学科对话。文中运用圣经学的来源批判和编修批判技术,藉此确定《马可福音》15:16-37是鲁迅《复仇(其二)》的底稿。此外,本文也论证鲁迅进一步利用了《马太福音》27:27-50编修其《复仇(其二)》。就圣经学的视角而言,学术界应重新审视鲁迅其他著作与圣经的互文性,以便研究文艺作品中的宗教性。不单如此,圣经学应能从文学接受、文学创作和文学批评三方面补充鲁迅学的发展。另一方面,鲁迅阅读圣经的焦点也颇具启发性,让读者发现了《马可福音》中耶稣受难曲的两个互补领域:一是公共论述;二是宗教经验。鲁迅的视角启迪圣经学者重新处理《马可福音》突兀结束的老问题。换言之,公共领域的圣经赏析也能开拓圣经研究的新视野。
This dissertation advocates the academic study of “Bible Acceptable History” and uses “intertextuality” as an analytical tool to try to explore interdisciplinary dialogues between Bible studies and literature (especially Lu Xun studies). The article uses the sources of biblical criticism and editing of critical techniques to determine the text of Mark 16:37, Luke’s revenge (second). In addition, the article also argues that Lu Xun made further use of Matthew 27: 27-50 to edit his revenge (the second). As far as biblical perspective is concerned, academia should re-examine the intertextuality of other works of Lu Xun and the Bible in order to study the religious aspects of literary and artistic works. Not only that, Biblical studies should be able to supplement the development of Lu Xun from the aspects of literature acceptance, literary creation and literary criticism. On the other hand, Lu Xun’s focus on reading the Bible is also illuminating, allowing readers to discover two complementary areas of Jesus’ suffering in Mark’s Gospel: one is public discourse; the other is religious experience. Lu Xun’s Perspective Inspired Bible Scholars to Resolve the Old Problem of “Mark’s Gospel” Stupidly End. In other words, biblical appreciation in the public domain can also open up new horizons in biblical research.