论文部分内容阅读
不少人以为,当下的美术批评,缺乏严肃的批评家的守望,似乎谁都可以挤进来,在那儿”卡拉OK”一把。由于缺乏学理的支撑,加上批评的新闻炒作倾向加剧,于是,美术批评只剩下热闹,众声喧哗中的批评家不时转换着角色,一会儿是“筹展人”,一会儿是“学术主持人”,转身又成了“艺术总监”。他们频繁地出现在媒体上,充当着“裁判”,在那儿意气风发地“指点”创作。或许太多的喧嚣,反而使画家觉得“五音令人耳聋”,画家甚至发出“理论该为画家减负了”的感叹。虽然画家把自己的负担都归为“批评惹的祸”有失公允。但对批评来说,让画家对批评皱眉,显然不是批评的目的。对于美术批评,画家看来意见不少,于是,我们想听听画家真实的想法。请一些画家拿起笔来做一回批评家,批评一下“美术批评”。但不少画家对于我们的提议,先是盛赞“点子很好“,然后又婉言说自己不长于写文章。其实,不少画家担心的是自己去批评那些长于文字的批评家,弄不好是自讨苦吃,何况,自己与批评家还要打交道呢。想说的话还是随着口水咽回到肚子里比较安全,“祸从口出”嘛。但还好有些画家接了这个“烫手山芋”,不然,这个选题就有点尴尬了。虽然刊登在这里的画家文章大多是婉转地点到为止,但其中一些见地还是耐人寻味的。当然,奢望这温柔的“一击?
Many people think that the current art criticism, the lack of serious critics watching, it seems that anyone can squeeze in, where “karaoke” a. Due to a lack of academic support and a growing tendency to criticize news hype, the lively critique of art criticism was left behind. Critics of the noisy conversions changed their roles from time to time, while for a while to be “founders,” while “academics ”Turned and became“ art director. ” They appear frequently in the media, acting as “referees”, where they gleefully “instruct” creations. Perhaps too much noise, but make painter feel “five deafening”, the painter even issued a “theoretical burden for the painter” sigh. Although the painter classifies his own burden as “the fault of criticism,” it is unfair. But for criticism, it is obviously not the purpose of criticism to let the artist frown on criticism. For art criticism, the artist seems to have a lot of opinions, so we would like to hear the artist’s real thoughts. Ask some painters to pick up pens for criticism once and criticize “art criticism.” However, for many artists, we first praised the idea that “good ideas” and then politely said that they are not longer than writing articles. In fact, many painters are worried about criticizing those longer-than-written critics themselves. They are not asking for anything. Moreover, they have to deal with critics. Want to say or with the saliva back to the stomach safer, “curse”. But fortunately some artists took this “hot potato”, otherwise, this topic a bit embarrassed. Although most of the artist’s articles published here are tactfully located, some of them are intriguing. Of course, expect this gentle "blow?