论文部分内容阅读
我状告广东美术馆的官司,引起公众及媒体广泛关注,事件报道及评论散见于7月1日后的部分报纸、杂志、网站等,大家可以查阅。现就某晚报展开的讨论,谈谈我的一点看法。 一个官司,总是有具体的问题,现在的讨论,已经绕开这些问题,滑向关于艺术问题的讨论,这正是许多人喜欢看到的。不过没关系,具体的东西由法院去评审,而艺术问题的讨论作为官司的额外意义,我也愿意“奉陪到底”——这
I sued the Guangdong Museum of Art’s case, aroused widespread public and media attention, incident reports and comments scattered in the July 1 after some newspapers, magazines, websites, etc., we can check. Now on a discussion of the evening news, talk about my point. A lawsuit always has concrete problems. The present discussion has bypassed these issues and slipped into the discussion of the art issues that many people like to see. But it does not matter, the specific things to judge by the court, and the discussion of art issues as the legal implications of the lawsuit, I am also willing to “stay with” - this