论文部分内容阅读
目的应用不同的方法对尿液细菌培养进行分析,比较结果的差异性.方法选取2012年1月-11月在我院住院或门诊就诊的96例患者尿液作为研究对象,采用平板接种法和增菌培养法进行培养分离鉴定.结果平板接种法培养出阳性例数为21例,占21.875%;增菌培养法培养出阳性例数34例,占35.42%.两者阳性检出率比较,差异具有统计学意义,χ2=4.31,P<0.05.结论尿液培养以增菌培养法阳性检出率较高,提倡临床使用此方法进行培养分离,以提高尿液培养的阳性检出率.“,”Objective To apply a different method of analysis, comparing the results of the urine culture differences. Methods January 2012 to Nov. 96 patients in our hospital or outpatient urine as an object of study, plated and culture enrichment culture Isolation and identification. Results plated train of positive cases, 21 cases, accounting for 21.875%;enrichment culture to cultivate positive cases and 34 cases, accounting for 35.42%. Both positive detection rate compared with a statisticaly significant difference, χ2 = 4.31, P<0.05.Conclusion urine culture enrichment culture higher detection rate of positive law, to promote the clinical use of this method for culturing and isolating, to improve urine cultures positive rate.