论文部分内容阅读
万宇问(以下简称问):自2001年上海三联书店出版了《先验批判:20世纪中国学术批评导论》一书后,该书随即在学术界引起了相当大的反响,有赞同也有质疑,文字见诸《书评周刊》、《社会科学报》、 《书城》、 《学术界》等报刊。 我想, 《先验批判》首先面临的置疑与追问,应该是“先验批判”这一概念的内涵与阐释问题,因而,它与康德反复表述的“先验批判”到底有何共性与差异?另一方面,由于先验意识研究在当代的最高成果是胡塞尔的现象学哲学,但在您的书中却基本上没有涉及,对此您有何解释?
Wan Yu asked (hereinafter referred to as): Since 2001, Shanghai Joint Publishing published the book “Transcendental Criticism: Introduction to Chinese Academic Criticism in the Twentieth Century,” the book then aroused considerable repercussions in academia, both agree and challenged, The text see “Book Review Weekly”, “Social Sciences”, “Bookstore”, “academia” and other newspapers and periodicals. I think the questioning and questioning facing “transcendental criticism” first should be the connotation and interpretation of the concept of “transcendental criticism.” Therefore, what is the commonalities and differences between it and the “transcendental criticism” that Kant repeatedly expresses? On the other hand, since the highest contemporary achievement of transcendental research is Husserl’s phenomenological philosophy, it is basically not covered in your book. What is your explanation?