论文部分内容阅读
德沃金的“正确答案”命题是一个异常重要而又充满争议的话题。在《原则问题》一书中,德沃金捍卫了“正确答案”命题并对其进行了有力的辩护,其中最为有趣的或许是他对于“对手V”和“对手R”的批判。在这个分析中,德沃金不仅捍卫了他的“权利”命题,而且超越了法律实证主义关于法律具有不确定性的难题。这有助于重新理解法律实证主义在20世纪遭遇的困境,也将领会在特定生活形式下超越语词之争对于法律哲学的重要性。
Dworkin’s “Correct Answers” proposition is an extremely important and controversial topic. Dworkin defended and defended the proposition of the “correct answer” in his book “The Problem of Principles.” Perhaps the most interesting of these was his claim to his rival V “Criticism. In this analysis, Dworkin not only defended his proposition of ”rights," but also surpassed the legal positivism’s difficult problem of law uncertainty. This will help to re-understand the plight of legal positivism encountered in the 20th century and will also understand the importance of legal discourse beyond the wording of words in certain forms of life.