论文部分内容阅读
义和团运动时期,帝俄财政大臣维特主张在京津和东北采取不同的对策。在前一地区,维特坚决反对进军北京;在东北地区,他先是反对出兵护路,后又积极敦促沙皇出兵东北。在东北问题上,沙皇采纳了维特的建议,但在京津问题上,沙皇并没有完全接受维特的主张。所以,义和团运动时期俄国的对华政策并非始终沿着维特所设计的轨道前行,而是表现出一定程度的矛盾性。
During the Boxer Rebellion, Vitus, the chancellor of Russia and Russia, advocated different measures in Beijing, Tianjin and Northeast China. In the former area, Witt resolutely opposed entering Beijing; in the northeast, he first opposed sending troops to protect the road and later actively urged the Tsar to send troops to the northeast. On the northeast issue, the Tsar adopted Witt’s suggestion, but on the Beijing-Tianjin issue, the Tsar did not completely accept Witt’s proposition. Therefore, during the Yihetuan Movement, Russia’s policy toward China did not always follow the track designed by Wittgenstein, but showed some degree of contradiction.