论文部分内容阅读
在刑事审判实践中,对于“一审量刑畸轻,或者应当适用附加刑而没有适用”的案件,在只有被告人一方提出上诉的情况下,二审法院的做法是先裁定维持原判,然后适用审判监督程序对被告人加刑,以免违反“上诉不加刑”原则。其根据是最高人民法院《关于执行〈中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法〉若干问题的解释》第二百五十七条第五项规定。但是,适用审判监督程序对被告人加刑不仅不是对“上诉不加刑”等法律原则的遵循,反而是对这些法律原则的破坏,加上本身亦存在不可克服的缺陷,该司法解释因而应当被废止。
In the criminal trial practice, the court of second instance adjudicates to uphold the original verdict on the case that “the first instance of the sentence is lenient or the supplementary sentence is not applicable” in the case where only one of the defendants appeals, and then the trial supervision Procedure to increase the defendant sentence, so as not to violate the “appeal without penalty” principle. It is based on Article 255 of the “Supreme People’s Court’s Interpretation of Several Issues Concerning the Implementation of the Criminal Procedure Law of the People’s Republic of China”. However, applying the procedure of trial supervision to impose the accused is not only not to follow the legal principle of “no sentence of appeasement”, but also to the destruction of these legal principles. In addition, there are inherent insurmountable shortcomings. Judicial interpretation should therefore Was abolished.