论文部分内容阅读
本文首先梳理了哈姆莱特在中国的形象的演变过程,发现笔者国莎学界受苏联影响,从五六十年代开始就将其确定为“人文主义者”的形象,改革开放后,不少学者质疑哈姆莱特的“人文主义者”身份,但由于传统观念的根深蒂固,两派的争论至今存在却处境尴尬。通过对不同观点的了解,笔者认为哈姆莱特富有人文性,却并不是一个人文主义者,由此也得到了启示,笔者做文学研究时候要注意跳出教材思维局限,善于借助新工具并且要多关注学术争鸣,做到兼听则明。
This paper first sorts out the evolution of Hamlet’s image in China and finds that the author’s image is influenced by the Soviet Union and has been identified as a “humanist” since the 1950s and 1960s. After the reform and opening up, Fewer scholars questioned Hamlet’s “humanist identity,” but because of the deep-rooted tradition, the debates between the two factions have so far been embarrassing. Through the understanding of different viewpoints, I think Hamlet is rich in humanity, but not a humanist, which also got enlightenment, I do literary studies should pay attention to jumping out of the textbook thinking limitations, good at using new tools and more Concerned about academic contests, and listen to that Ming.