论文部分内容阅读
这篇文章提供了一个关于法经济学分析如何通过增加对真实人类行为的关注而提高的广阔视野。这篇文章的目的是通过引入一种更准确地理解了人类行为及其原因的选择观,提出法经济学分析的一个新方法。行为经济学与传统模型比起来,似乎更能预测和解释那些协商失败而交由仲裁者终结的谈判。在这篇文章中,作者指出有限理性,尤其是禀赋效应,对传统的法经济学主张提出了质疑。作者用行为经济学解释法律内容的机制是简易、传统的,是对先前许多关于事后偏见研究的直接推测。事后偏见在侵权法制度中似乎根深蒂固,以至于人们即使唤起法官对它的注意,法官(更不用说陪审员)可能也难于承认或者解决事后偏见。
This article provides a broad perspective on how the law and economics analysis can be enhanced by increasing attention to real human behavior. The purpose of this article is to propose a new approach to legal and economic analysis by introducing a concept of choice that more accurately understands human behavior and its causes. Compared with traditional models, behavioral economics seems to be better able to predict and explain the negotiations that failed to be ended by the arbitrators. In this article, the author points out the bounded rationality, especially the endowment effect, which challenges traditional legal and economic claims. The mechanism by which authors interpret the content of the law using behavioral economics is straightforward and traditional and is a direct presumption of many previous studies of posterior bias. Ex post biases appear to be deeply rooted in the tort law system so that even if one arouses the judge’s attention to it, judges (not to mention jurors) may find it difficult to recognize or resolve ex post biases.