论文部分内容阅读
《钓鱼》2007年5月(下)刊登了本人一篇《我对子线长度与灵敏度的认识》的文章,文章针对山东衣善新钓友的大作《子线长度与灵敏度》一文提出了一些不同见解。当时我没准备再写下文,因为我的观点谈的已经很清楚了,没必要画蛇添足,再者我对反复争论一个话题有些顾虑,争鸣性的文章如果措辞不当有时候会伤害了钓友之间的感情。比如去年我同柳树仁钓友在杂志上争论浮标调目、钓目的作用问题时,争论到后期,我就感觉到了一些火药味,只好及时刹车。但是收到《钓鱼》杂志第13、14期后,看到其中连载了山东栖霞尚立和钓友的《也谈子线长度与灵敏度》的文章,文中对衣善新钓友的观点表示了支持,也婉转的对我的见解提出了不同意见,促使我有了将本人观点进一步阐明的决心,也算是对衣、尚两位钓友的回答,或者也可博有兴趣看完拙文的钓友一笑。
Fishing May 2007 (below) published an article entitled “My Understanding of the Length and Sensitivity of the Strand”. Some articles are presented in the article titled “Length and Sensitivity of the Strand” Different opinion. At that time, I was not prepared to write the following article because my point of view was already very clear. I did not need to be superfluous. Moreover, I had some concerns about the topic of repeated arguments. If the wording of the contending article is not good, it sometimes hurts the fishermen feeling. Last year, for example, when I discussed with Liu Shuren fishing friends in the magazine about the problem of buoys and the purpose of fishing, I felt some of the smell of gunpowder and had to brake in time. However, after receiving the articles 13 and 14 of Fishing Magazine, I saw the article titled “Length and Sensitivity of the Stub of the Strait”, which contains the Qilu Shangli and Diaoyu Islands in Shandong. Support, but also tactfully put forward different opinions on my opinion, prompting me to have the determination to further clarify my point of view, can also be regarded as the answer to clothing, still two fishing friends, or can also be interested in reading my article Friends laugh.