论文部分内容阅读
报载今年电影金鸡奖评选过程中,夏衍同志对《乡音》提出批评,会上有些同志对此提出相反的意见,展开了热烈的讨论。最近《文汇报》还登载一篇题为《为陶春一辩》的与夏衍同志争鸣的文章。我为电影界这场争鸣叫好!它好就好在民主空气浓郁,大家都可以毫无顾虑地发表意见。它表现在:一、对即使象《乡音》这样的优秀的影片,夏衍同志能以“普通一兵”的身份公开坦率地提出自己批评性的意见;二、一些中字辈、小字辈的电影工作者不因老前辈发
In the course of appointing the Golden Rooster Award for this year’s movie, Comrade Xia Yan criticized the “accent”. Some comrades at the meeting made the opposite opinions and started a lively discussion. Recently, “Wen Wei Po” also published an article entitled “Debate for Tao Chun,” comrade Xia Yan and argue. I am applauding the debate in the movie industry! It is good that democracy is strong and everyone can express their opinions without any worries. It manifests itself in the following aspects: First, even for such excellent films as “accent”, Comrade Xia Yan can openly and candidly submit his own critical opinions as an “ordinary soldier.” Second, some junior and junior filmmakers Not because of the older generation hair